UN Approves U.S. Plan for Gaza Stabilization, Endorsing Trump’s 20-Point Peace Blueprint

The United Nations Security Council has approved a U.S.-led resolution designed to stabilize Gaza following two years of devastating conflict. The measure passed with 13 votes in favor, while Russia and China abstained, rejecting a rival proposal from Russia.

What the Resolution Does

Authorizes an international stabilization force in Gaza, with a broad mandate to provide security, oversee borders, help demilitarize armed groups, and coordinate humanitarian aid.

Establishes a transitional authority, dubbed the “Board of Peace,” to be overseen by former U.S. President Donald Trump.

Sets the mandate for both the force and the Board of Peace to expire at the end of 2027.

Envisions a possible future path to Palestinian self-determination, emphasizing “a credible pathway” to statehood after reconstruction and reforms to the Palestinian Authority.

Requires a gradual Israeli withdrawal, based on agreed benchmarks linked to demilitarization.

Political Reactions & Implications

Trump celebrated the vote, calling it “one of the biggest approvals in the history of the United Nations” and framing it as a historic moment for peace.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Mike Waltz, described the resolution as a “significant step toward a stable Gaza” that could prosper while ensuring Israel’s security.

Hamas strongly opposed the plan, arguing it fails to meet the full political and humanitarian demands of the Palestinian people.

Russia’s U.N. Ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, said Moscow abstained because the text did not include a formal role for the Security Council or a robust commitment to an independent Palestinian state.

Why This Matters

This resolution marks a pivotal moment in Gaza’s post-war future:

Stabilization Framework: For the first time, the U.N. is formally authorizing an international force that could help demilitarize Gaza and maintain long-term security.

Transitional Governance: The Board of Peace represents an unprecedented governance model, giving Trump a symbolic—but internationally-backed—role.

Statehood Pathway: Language urging progress toward Palestinian self-determination was strengthened through diplomatic pressure, especially from Arab nations.

Global Diplomatic Win: The U.S. maneuvered to build regional backing — including from several Arab states — convincing the U.N. that its plan is more than just political theater.

Challenges Ahead

The Board of Peace has yet to be formed, and critical details such as membership and operational structure remain unclear.

The international stabilization force could face legitimacy and logistical hurdles, especially in securing troop-contributing countries.

There is no guaranteed timeline for statehood; the resolution only frames it as a possible future development.